Heterodox economics: A common challenge to mainstream economics?
نویسنده
چکیده
There is evidence of an increasing coherence, and openness to communication, among the different strands of economics. The purpose of this paper is to address the questions this raises as to whether or not there is still a useful role for the concept of schools of thought. We explore first the categories of orthodox economics and heterodox economics and how we can expect them to develop in the future. In particular, is the relationship between orthodoxy and heterodoxy dualistic, and if so where does this leave pluralism in general and schools of thought within heterodox economics in particular? The meaning of pluralism is explored further with respect to heterodox economics, and the notion of structured pluralism is developed. Structured pluralism can be understood in terms of categories, connections and absence of connections, which, like pluralism, can be applied at a variety of levels. Categories are necessary for knowledge, and some (incomplete) connectivity is necessary for the process of building up new knowledge. The social system, similarly, functions by means of the categorisation of institutions, and (incomplete) connections between them. In the same way, schools of thought are a necessary part of the process of building up and communicating economic knowledge, within a pluralist framework. It is concluded therefore that schools of thought will continue to play an important role in terms of different communities and approaches within heterodox economics. But it is in the nature of structured pluralism that the structure is partial, and thus not allencompassing. It is also provisional and therefore subject to change. In this way schools of thought are enabling rather than constraining. A version of this paper is to be published under the title ‘A Future for Schools of Thought in Heterodox Economics’ in J T Harvey and R F Garnett (eds), Future Directions for Heterodox Economics. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press, 2006. It has benefited from helpful comments and suggestions from Victoria Chick, John Davis, Rob Garnett, Matthias Klaes, Brian Loasby and Esther-Mirjam Sent. Department of Economics University of Stirling Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland, UK Phone: +44-1786-467474 Fax: +44-1786-467469 e-mail: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
The (confused) state of equilibrium analysis in modern economics: an explanation
Modern economics produces many interpretations of the category of equilibrium as well as competing views of its relevance or worth for economic theorizing. In particular, interpretations and valuations often differ systematically between mainstream and heterodox contributions. I argue that these differences are best explained through understanding the competing ontological presuppositions of th...
متن کاملPlurality in Orthodox and Heterodox Economics*
Several observers have noted signs of a growing plurality in mainstream economics. At the same time there has been a growing emphasis in heterodox economics on commonality. The purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of plurality in economics in order to make sense of these characterisations, and to consider the issues raised by this plurality. The critical factor is to distinguish betwe...
متن کاملJournals as constituents of scientific discourse: economic heterodoxy
Purpose: to provide a view and analysis of the immediate field of journals which surround a number of key heterodox economics journals. Design/methodology/approach: Using citation data from the Science and Social Science Citation Index, the individual and collective networks of a number of journals in this field are analyzed. Findings: The size and shape of the citation networks of journals can...
متن کاملEducating Latin American Economists
Graduate economic programmes in Latin America have evolved along the lines of two different traditions: one closely linked to the current economic mainstream (being in that sense ‘global’) and the other more local and heterodox. This paper provides an overview of perceptions, interests, concerns and opinions of global Latin American graduate economic programmes, comparing them with similar prog...
متن کاملProspects for the Progress of Heterodox Economics
While progress in orthodox economics is understood as an internal concept, progress in heterodox economics has both an internal and external dimension, where the latter refers to persuasive success. This broader understanding of progress reflects the fundamental, methodological level at which we distinguish between orthodox and heterodox economics. Regarding internal progress, orthodox economic...
متن کامل